|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 10, 2010 22:49:11 GMT
-3
|
|
|
Post by Elmach on Jun 10, 2010 22:52:12 GMT
-2
Why was 6 afraid of 7? Because 7 8 9!
And so begins the endless 7 8 9 jokes...
These may repeat forever...
And I finally get to one...
But I don't like negatives...
Yet we continue going down...
For now, we'll stay...
Or not...
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 11, 2010 0:24:01 GMT
-3
|
|
|
Post by Elmach on Jun 11, 2010 1:15:51 GMT
-2
Why was 6 afraid of 7? Because 7 8 9! And so begins the endless 7 8 9 jokes... These may repeat forever... And I finally get to one... But I don't like negatives... Yet we continue going down... For now, we'll stay... Or not... Or so...
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 11, 2010 2:42:02 GMT
-3
|
|
|
Post by necrodoom on Jun 11, 2010 13:51:03 GMT
-2
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Jun 12, 2010 2:20:58 GMT
The negative of (the number of simulators I have done for MultiSim out of a possible four simulators) minus one.
Post Script: I have done WarSim 2.0 and RebelSim...
|
|
|
Post by necrodoom on Jun 12, 2010 10:46:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Rabidbadger on Jun 12, 2010 10:52:08 GMT
-1
|
|
|
Post by necrodoom on Jun 12, 2010 11:40:01 GMT
-2
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 12, 2010 17:41:41 GMT
-3
|
|
|
Post by Rabidbadger on Jun 13, 2010 9:51:52 GMT
-2
|
|
|
Post by necrodoom on Jun 13, 2010 14:52:18 GMT
-1
|
|
|
Post by ~Memzak~ on Jun 13, 2010 15:39:54 GMT
0
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Jun 14, 2010 21:14:03 GMT
Just for the sake of keeping with the arithmetic pattern that is exclusive to this page, I will invoke the universal number for this post, i.e. 1.
|
|
|
Post by elton on Jun 14, 2010 21:50:52 GMT
2
|
|
|
Post by Rabidbadger on Jun 15, 2010 19:00:28 GMT
3
|
|
|
Post by elton on Jun 15, 2010 19:02:03 GMT
4
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 15, 2010 23:55:40 GMT
5
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Jun 16, 2010 3:21:29 GMT
6
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 16, 2010 4:59:33 GMT
5
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Jun 16, 2010 20:46:55 GMT
The answer to any and all binary operations whose two arguments are 2 and 2, e.g. 2 + 2, 2 * 2, 22, et cetera.
NOTE: I consider "subtraction" to be "the addition of a negative with another number" (thereby making subtraction a form of addition) and "division" to be "the multiplication of a reciprocal with another number" (thereby making division a form of multiplication) and "roots" to be "fractional powers" (thereby making roots a form of powers).
With these equalities in mind, I may rightfully say "all binary operations."
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 24, 2010 19:31:19 GMT
3
|
|
|
Post by aWeSum on Jun 24, 2010 19:43:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by izacque on Jun 26, 2010 2:20:39 GMT
those of us with text-only browsers can't read the number, fool!
1
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 26, 2010 9:03:53 GMT
0
|
|
|
Post by ganondorfchampin on Jun 26, 2010 13:38:25 GMT
The answer to any and all binary operations whose two arguments are 2 and 2, e.g. 2 + 2, 2 * 2, 2 2, et cetera. NOTE: I consider "subtraction" to be "the addition of a negative with another number" (thereby making subtraction a form of addition) and "division" to be "the multiplication of a reciprocal with another number" (thereby making division a form of multiplication) and "roots" to be "fractional powers" (thereby making roots a form of powers).
With these equalities in mind, I may rightfully say "all binary operations."You forgot logs and special case binary operations. Another way to say it is any hyperopertion of addition or higher. 00000000001.00000000000
|
|
|
Post by izacque on Jun 26, 2010 17:48:38 GMT
I can do math too!
1-1
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Jun 30, 2010 0:17:26 GMT
Ah, I forgot entirely about the logarithms. log22 = 1 ≠ 4
I guess I should give you karma for pointing that out and wording it correctly.
eiπ
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 30, 2010 4:55:26 GMT
-2
|
|