|
Post by Elmach on Feb 24, 2011 23:47:56 GMT
The first odd prime multiplied by the Medieval Perfect Number.
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Feb 25, 2011 2:51:59 GMT
31 Prime
It is also a superprime, i.e. the nth prime number, when n is a prime number.
E.g. 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, and 19 are primes.
2 is prime #1. 1 is not prime. 2 is ergo not a superprime. 3 is prime #2. 2 is prime. 3 is ergo a superprime. 5 is prime #3. 3 is prime. 5 is ergo a superprime. 7 is prime #4. 4 is not prime. 7 is ergo not a superprime. 11 is prime #5. 5 is prime. 11 is ergo a superprime.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Feb 25, 2011 2:55:55 GMT
The answer to life, the universe and everything minus the medieval perfect number. The first prime raised to the third prime's power.
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Feb 26, 2011 2:45:33 GMT
The product of the second and fifth prime numbers...
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 2, 2011 2:00:41 GMT
The first non-prime multiple of 1116.
|
|
|
Post by Elmach on Mar 2, 2011 4:27:41 GMT
Umm...
35?
Not prime.
5*7.
Also, wouldn't 11 be a supersuperprime?
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 2, 2011 5:50:49 GMT
3 is superprime #1. 1 is not prime. Thus 3 is not a supersuperprime. 5 is superprime #2. 2 is prime. Thus 5 is a supersuperprime. 11 is superprime #3. 3 is prime. Thus 11 is a supersuperprime. 17 is superprime #4. 4 is not prime. Thus 17 is not a supersuperprime. 31 is superprime #5. 5 is prime. Thus 31 is a supersuperprime. 41 is superprime #6. 6 is not prime. Thus 41 is a supersuperprime. 59 is superprime #7. 7 is prime. Thus 59 is a supersuperprime. 61 is superprime #8. 8 is not prime. Thus 61 is not a supersuperprime. 79 is superprime #9. 9 is not prime. Thus 79 is not a supersuperprime. 107 is superprime #10. 10 is not prime. Thus 107 is not a supersuperprime. Etc...
So yes, 11 is a supersuperprime. In fact, it is the first supersupersuperprime because it is supersuperprime#2.
THIRTY-SIX
|
|
|
Post by noodlesoup on Mar 11, 2011 6:58:02 GMT
37.
Prime.
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Mar 11, 2011 7:01:36 GMT
Twice nineteen...
|
|
|
Post by noodlesoup on Mar 11, 2011 7:01:55 GMT
Thrice thirteen
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Mar 11, 2011 7:07:13 GMT
The product of two cubed and five...
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 12, 2011 16:18:50 GMT
FORTY-ONE
PRIME
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Mar 12, 2011 21:43:20 GMT
The answer to the question of life, the universe, and everything...but what is the question?
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 12, 2011 21:45:58 GMT
And then again, the answer may not be correct...
FORTY-THREE
PRIME
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 12, 2011 22:34:59 GMT
Fourty-four is most assuredly not prime.
|
|
|
Post by Elmach on Mar 13, 2011 2:45:39 GMT
32*5, which can't possibly be prime.
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Mar 13, 2011 2:56:10 GMT
Twice twenty-three...
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 13, 2011 3:05:18 GMT
1*47. Prime alright.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 13, 2011 5:37:36 GMT
e^[4i(.5!)2]+7^2
OHPS!
e^[4i(.5!)2] yields negative one, not positive one...
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 13, 2011 6:44:28 GMT
Take a seven, right? Now take another seven. Put it next to the first one. Add a dot between the two. There! You're done!
|
|
|
Post by Elmach on Mar 13, 2011 7:02:32 GMT
Two Five Fives.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 13, 2011 7:10:45 GMT
Seventeen. But, three times.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 13, 2011 7:15:46 GMT
|(e^[4i(.5!)2]-the previous number)|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 13, 2011 7:17:30 GMT
53. Prime.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 13, 2011 7:38:49 GMT
The square root of fifty-four. And a thousand. Minus one hundred eighty-three. Plus twelve. Minus one hundred seventy-one. Minus six hundred and fifty-eight. To the power of one half. To the power of four.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 13, 2011 7:52:32 GMT
Fifty Five. Nothing about this number is prime. At all. Five and eleven make such a nice pair, though, don't you think?
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 13, 2011 7:56:04 GMT
Yes, but seven and eight make a better pair.
1107
|
|
|
Post by Elmach on Mar 21, 2011 23:31:17 GMT
57A 1117
You may THINK it's prime...
Grothendieck says it's prime...
It isn't.
Three and Nineteen go so well together, though. But some people, like Grothendieck, don't believe this.
|
|
|
Post by RubiksMaster123 on Mar 22, 2011 0:39:57 GMT
58. wow not a primape at all
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 22, 2011 0:52:42 GMT
FIFTY-NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINE IS PRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIME
|
|