|
Post by nmagain on Jul 23, 2011 17:59:24 GMT
Nmagane you seem to be having problems here. It's not sensitivity. It's not letting you- or really anyone ho I manage to screenshot with a porn link- get away with posting porn. And I will deny th thing about Vert's servr, in fact, I got you banned over there and I'm satisfied with that. Since you don't seem to understand: danballforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=announcevital&action=display&thread=88That handy dandy link there is to the forum rules. Within the rules is the rule: Posting nudity/hentai Risk: Post deletion, Permanent ban. NO. Hentai is Anime porn, which is nudity, which is bad. Big no-no. This includes porn in ASCII form. Now, unless you make an actual point, I refuse to argue with you further on this matter. It bre i didn't post nudity or hentai, i just posted a link, I can't see that in the rules. also it bre
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Jul 23, 2011 18:14:15 GMT
I had a horizontal rule and a hard return, and then indicated that this situation is going very well, before the Aperture Science announcer correctly identified that my indication of this going very well was sarcasm. Nothing above the horizontal rule was identified by the Aperture Science announcer as sarcasm.
You get two weeks banishment on chat starting with when MachPunch first made the report in the Ban Board. If you think his banishment is unfair and biased, then I could invalidate that and instead implement your two week punishment starting now, but unless you work with principle, I don't see practically why anyone would extend the amount of time he stays punished.
|
|
|
Post by nmagain on Jul 23, 2011 19:08:22 GMT
I had a horizontal rule and a hard return, and then indicated that this situation is going very well, before the Aperture Science announcer correctly identified that my indication of this going very well was sarcasm. Nothing above the horizontal rule was identified by the Aperture Science announcer as sarcasm. You get two weeks banishment on chat starting with when MachPunch first made the report in the Ban Board. If you think his banishment is unfair and biased, then I could invalidate that and instead implement your two week punishment starting now, but unless you work with principle, I don't see practically why anyone would extend the amount of time he stays punished. fuck that shit i talk via other people
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on Aug 10, 2011 19:34:49 GMT
I would have to agree with the two week maximum ban on chat. And regardless, Nmagane, the link a user posts is their responsibility, both on the chat and on the forum, even if it was intended to be a "joke".
Be satisfied you will be able to access the chat within two weeks, less now even. Certain users cannot even access it anymore...
|
|
|
Post by Rock on Aug 10, 2011 19:41:44 GMT
He was unbanned prematurely by Fox awhile ago, and the 2 week ban would've been up by now anyway...
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on Aug 10, 2011 19:45:20 GMT
Well never mind then. I would not know because Modnary still has to tell me how to fix my Chatango...
The bold text is directed to Modnary.
|
|
|
Post by Draxorion on Aug 27, 2011 20:41:29 GMT
Maybe you've blocked it for some reason? I mean, a Chatango bot... What exactly did you use it for? Filling up user amounts? Then there shouldn't have been a problem.
|
|