yes its me... Please read this
|
|
Post by dhoom on Jul 29, 2010 1:16:17 GMT
Welcome Back, Molopoy. I'll give you a little update on what's happened so far.
TheListo has quit. He's gone. Kaput, vanished. When he quit, he installed somebody anonymous named "Lag" into the position of forum owner. Nobody liked lag, even Myself, and I suck up to a lot of staff members. With the help of Ggoodie, we kicked him out, and set up a new forum with GeneralVeers as the owner of this place.
QwertyuiopThePie is away until the end of July, and GeneralVeers runs everything now.
Things have been steady from there.
I welcome you back to the forum. I don't think anybody wants you gone; as I'm sure you can see, we're a little low on members and low in activity. We need all the new members we can get...
|
|
|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on Jul 29, 2010 1:18:14 GMT
Thank you for the apology.
I don't entirely believe you didn't brute force Qwerty's account, but I support your return. I will bring this up in the staff board.
Edit: Staff, don't delete this thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2010 1:22:10 GMT
Thanks  |
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Jul 29, 2010 1:30:52 GMT
Well. This seems to be an appropriate time to confide some information I was given to you all. This came from Qwerty, and I'm not sure he will be too happy with me. Two of the "3 comings of Molopoy" were faked. One was a cover up. The other was... a cover up. IF I remember correctly. No wait... One was a cover up. Another wasn't deliberately covered up but the rumor spread it was you... And the first one, said Qwerty, was a little suspect, and may not have been you. So, after that, I thought you only hacked once, using a brute forcer. But I'm glad it was only a stupid lie. Let's let bygones be bygones. Now, I'm not saying WHO did the cover up(s). Firstly, because that is Qwerty's job. Second, because I can't even remember LOL. I'm glad you're back. I've heard some good stuff about you actually. DO YOU LIKE PG TECHNOLOGY??? Also, watch out for trolls...
I got this info from Qwerty when I was talking about helping him usurp Listo near the end. I was offering to hack him. But then I realized it was wrong. And I would probably fail. So I told Listo what Qwerty was planning. Yes Qwerty, I was the information leak. Ever wonder why I defended the other suspect against all odds in your mind? I felt guilty for possibly getting them in trouble. And then, I wanted to stay on good terms with you. Hoping to warn Listo... Hacking is wrong. Very... Very... Very... Wrong...
|
|
|
|
Post by Yonder on Jul 29, 2010 3:39:49 GMT
I don't recall anything from my experience on the old forums from you, but I'll say apology accepted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Jul 29, 2010 4:48:57 GMT
Welcome back, Molopoy.
As you may have noticed, we have revolted from TheListo after he slowly descended from our respect by deleting threads from the original forum and bringing in a "stranger" as a new forum owner. We originally created this forum as a backup in the event that anything should happen to the older one, and we eventually decided to make a full move here. I created the forum, but to avoid the same mistakes that were made under TheListo, I shared my account password with the two other Administrators. We made a few changes in the new forum that I think might work, and we have kept many old things, too. One of the new things we did was clear away all bans and warnings, leaving everyone with a fresh start.
I am glad to see that you are apologizing for plagiarizing. Since we do not carry bans from the previous forum to this one, and since you seem genuine, I feel I may act on many members' behalf in welcoming you back. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Jul 29, 2010 6:32:19 GMT
Well, You don't know me Molopoy.
When you made your supposed threats and attacks, I was on hiatus. Or wasn't a member yet. I honestly cannot say I remember.
By the way, Dhoom, it was Chrono that enabled the revolt, not GG. Hah, I wish I had screenshotted when i openly contested Lag. He got his ass handed to him by a global moderator.
I still maintain he was Listo. And I hold a deep disrespect for Listo. I maintain that I will ban Listo on sight, regardless of orders, for as long as it is in my power to do so. And as such, i'm willing to believe you were unjustly banned, particularly due to your apologies.
I hold no grudges. But I warn you. Some may.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2010 7:03:34 GMT
Lol if you ever need a contest judge with lots of experience making and judging contests you always know who to ask  |
|
|
|
Post by nmagain on Jul 29, 2010 13:24:35 GMT
Welcome back amigo. But I'm pretty sure qwerty won't be happy about this.
|
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on Jul 29, 2010 16:13:47 GMT
Hello, Molopoy. I do not believe you know me either, yet I was present at the time of your supposed "hacking." I was not completely present when all of this controversy had happened, yet most if not all of us were present when we had seen TheListo's revelation of his true self. Considering your apology, it appears you are sincerely telling the truth.
An apology such as this is well worth forgiveness in my eyes. I welcome you back to the forum, and encourage everyone else to do so.
|
|
|
|
Post by clockwork on Jul 29, 2010 16:27:28 GMT
I don't see why he shouldn't be given another chance like I was. I mean honestly. I did things like him and got another chance and look at me now XD.
Hopefully he'll turn out better than I did...
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Memzak~ on Jul 30, 2010 14:42:41 GMT
What the Molopoy is this? , see what I did there? Anyways... do you remember me? My opinion of you is very tainted I must save, I'll try to be willing to start anew. BUT I SWEAR IF YOU DO ANYTHING TO HURT THIS FORUMS I WILL HUNT YOU DOWN MYSELFWe'll see... |
|
|
|
Post by vaconcovat on Jul 30, 2010 21:23:23 GMT
Oh, it's you.
To be honest, i never really liked you. But, welcome back, I am willing to give you a second chance.
Oh, and the DBT were never really going to happen. I was too busy, and for ease we used Realm Crafter, which honestly is a disaster of a program. It was just a gimmick, and im sorry it caused you to be excluded from the forums.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rabidbadger on Jul 31, 2010 10:21:33 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jul 31, 2010 20:32:15 GMT
Yay, Molopoy is back! Un-yay, I'm never trusting MF again. Way to betray my trust multiple times, MF. We are going to have a very serious conversation when I get back.
Molopoy was nice, and it is true that someone could have easily stolen his name. Looks like it was greenpotato all along.
|
|
|
|
Post by noodlesoup on Jul 31, 2010 21:29:46 GMT
Welcome back molopoy. I now see you're not the type of "hut" greenpatato was.
|
|
|
|
Post by Buggy793 on Jul 31, 2010 22:31:50 GMT
Well, whether or not it was greenpotato, welcome back. Even though I'm on here less than you are. lol |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2010 0:48:24 GMT
Yay, Molopoy is back! Un-yay, I'm never trusting MF again. Way to betray my trust multiple times, MF. We are going to have a very serious conversation when I get back. Molopoy was nice, and it is true that someone could have easily stolen his name. Looks like it was greenpotato all along. I was kind of worried you would hate me (thats what people were saying on chat) nice to see that pretty much everyone Is ok with me BTW: who the heck is greenpotato? |
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Aug 1, 2010 3:55:02 GMT
For a while, we thought you were. If not, conspiracy theorists will have to revise their theories to give greenpotato a new identity...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2010 7:18:37 GMT
Who is green potato, what did he do?
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Aug 1, 2010 21:57:08 GMT
The person that most likely really did it. A member that joined shortly after you did and had the same IP as the attacker. We assumed it was you until recently.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2010 22:09:49 GMT
The person that most likely really did it. A member that joined shortly after you did and had the same IP as the attacker. We assumed it was you until recently. I know its annoying that I keep asking questions but who is the attacker? |
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Aug 2, 2010 3:13:55 GMT
Greenpotato.
|
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Aug 2, 2010 3:26:57 GMT
PO-TA-TOES! Boil 'em mash 'em stick 'em in a stew!
Please refrain from spamming.
-General Veers
*Gives Veers a humor card* That sticks in your brain. It's a standard PCI slot, should nestle nicely between the sound and video cards.
- Micro Farad
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2010 6:51:56 GMT
yeah but I mean what did he actually do, you reefer to him as the 'attacker' so what did he do for you to say that? |
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Aug 2, 2010 7:50:15 GMT
It seemed like an appropriate time for a Lord of the Rings quote. After all, not only does it pertain to potatoes, but also specifically mentions bodily harm to potatoes, including third degree burns from dihydrogenmonoxide, excessive pressure, and even ingestion (which includes the painful processes of mastication, swallowing, and finally dropping into a vat of diluted hydrochloric acid and enzymes designed to break apart complex carbohydrates, such as the starch in potatoes). In short, it discusses the burning, deforming, and breaking down on a macro scale AS WELL as breaking down on on a molecular level, of potatoes. Due to the atmosphere of the conversation, I deduced that people may be humored by the association between a despicable former member, and an unfortunate vegetable, being destroyed at every imaginable scale, as described by none other than the fictional character , Sam Gamge (spelling?). Now, due to the rather concise nature of the post, and it's seemingly weak link to the conversation at hand, you labeled it as spam. However, seen in this light, the post was an extraordinary example of a comment designed to entertain, which, as we all know, can actually draw a conversation into the correct perspective. Correct being analogous to macroscopic. The art of maintaining a perfect social balance includes more than cold logic. It requires lightheartedness. Thus, I begin my holistic meta debate over the issue, for it comes to mind that some may prefer to keep a conversation strictly to one subject. However, I retort that such a narrow focus, while at first useful, can also quickly lead to frustration. Like a laser passing through a convex lens, the discussion will narrow to a point. However, after that point, the conversation looses focus as it's participant's minds become numb to the intensity. What is needed is a sharp dose of humor, which can act as another convex lens, refocusing the conversation, or at least slowing or halting it's dissipation. Thus, I believe it is important to allow some slightly off topic behavior in a conversation, for only in that way will you succeed in sparing the conversation from a painful and slow death. Do you see it my way now? But back to the issue at hand. Your correction of me was like a mirror. Suddenly the conversation has taken this turn. Now we are discussing something almost entirely unrelated. The only solace in this matter is that some may find it numerous. And see, even if it was not best to post the quote, the lesser evil would be to ignore the so called "spam", for your correction has brought this sharp turn to the train of our thoughts. And trains, as you know, turn gradually. A sharp turn may derail a train, or if it is moving fast, the train may fly off of it's tracks. And this is exactly what has happened. The methodical track of our discussion has sharply turned, throwing the train, and all of it's cars (cars being the members) off of the track of our conversation. And like a wreaked train, I fully expect this thread to die.
P.S. Among this wall of text you can find humor. Perhaps this will re-focus the conversation! Anyways, hope you enjoyed, I'm not actually mad lol.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2010 10:02:31 GMT
It seemed like an appropriate time for a Lord of the Rings quote. After all, not only does it pertain to potatoes, but also specifically mentions bodily harm to potatoes, including third degree burns from dihydrogenmonoxide, excessive pressure, and even ingestion (which includes the painful processes of mastication, swallowing, and finally dropping into a vat of diluted hydrochloric acid and enzymes designed to break apart complex carbohydrates, such as the starch in potatoes). In short, it discusses the burning, deforming, and breaking down on a macro scale AS WELL as breaking down on on a molecular level, of potatoes. Due to the atmosphere of the conversation, I deduced that people may be humored by the association between a despicable former member, and an unfortunate vegetable, being destroyed at every imaginable scale, as described by none other than the fictional character , Sam Gamge (spelling?). Now, due to the rather concise nature of the post, and it's seemingly weak link to the conversation at hand, you labeled it as spam. However, seen in this light, the post was an extraordinary example of a comment designed to entertain, which, as we all know, can actually draw a conversation into the correct perspective. Correct being analogous to macroscopic. The art of maintaining a perfect social balance includes more than cold logic. It requires lightheartedness. Thus, I begin my holistic meta debate over the issue, for it comes to mind that some may prefer to keep a conversation strictly to one subject. However, I retort that such a narrow focus, while at first useful, can also quickly lead to frustration. Like a laser passing through a convex lens, the discussion will narrow to a point. However, after that point, the conversation looses focus as it's participant's minds become numb to the intensity. What is needed is a sharp dose of humor, which can act as another convex lens, refocusing the conversation, or at least slowing or halting it's dissipation. Thus, I believe it is important to allow some slightly off topic behavior in a conversation, for only in that way will you succeed in sparing the conversation from a painful and slow death. Do you see it my way now? But back to the issue at hand. Your correction of me was like a mirror. Suddenly the conversation has taken this turn. Now we are discussing something almost entirely unrelated. The only solace in this matter is that some may find it numerous. And see, even if it was not best to post the quote, the lesser evil would be to ignore the so called "spam", for your correction has brought this sharp turn to the train of our thoughts. And trains, as you know, turn gradually. A sharp turn may derail a train, or if it is moving fast, the train may fly off of it's tracks. And this is exactly what has happened. The methodical track of our discussion has sharply turned, throwing the train, and all of it's cars (cars being the members) off of the track of our conversation. And like a wreaked train, I fully expect this thread to die. P.S. Among this wall of text you can find humor. Perhaps this will re-focus the conversation! Anyways, hope you enjoyed, I'm not actually mad lol. Whaaaa? *puzzled* |
|
|
|
Post by Rabidbadger on Aug 2, 2010 11:04:27 GMT
He's saying that he was using humour in a relevant way to save the conversation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Aug 2, 2010 22:55:24 GMT
He demoted a bunch of staff members. See the forum history thread (which we will now have to update).
|
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Aug 6, 2010 7:49:21 GMT
See? I have re-focused the conversation with my over sized chunk of humorous prose. All I know about Green Potato is that he may have been the person who actually did all this. But, that was a well kept secret and nothing more than a theory for a long time. These revelations cast more light on the situation. God, there has been so much drama here over the years...
|
|
|
[M:977802]
