|
|
Post by hwa123 on Dec 18, 2010 23:44:13 GMT
Everyone always asks me this question. What do you think?  |
|
|
|
Post by GloveParty on Dec 21, 2010 22:55:53 GMT
Usually, bug fixes never come by themselves in updates.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Dec 30, 2010 18:59:25 GMT
Why is nobody going for the features? Seriously, the features are the best. Elements are all very well, but what you can do with them is limited. New features apply universally. If you want elements, go play wxsand. The features are what sets Powder Game apart.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rock on Dec 30, 2010 20:08:15 GMT
yeah, features are good, but what good are features without the elements?
|
|
|
|
Post by clockwork on Dec 30, 2010 21:01:13 GMT
What are features?
|
|
|
|
Post by Magnum_SAMP on Dec 31, 2010 0:32:16 GMT
New elemental balls !?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2010 0:55:38 GMT
I put my vote out to a new feature, because, like Qwertyuiop said, new elements are great, but features are what make the game have more possibilities, more things become possible, if all we get is new elements, then sure, we will have lots of elements to use, but there functionality is limited.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Dec 31, 2010 6:08:11 GMT
Features are nothing without elements, true, but we have a metric heckload (It's a real unit of measurement; it's in the Geneva convention, look it up!) of elements. In wxsand, you can make your own elements all you want, but there's no other features, which is what makes PG better (by some standards, anyway).
|
|
[M:977802]
