|
Post by secret on Jan 3, 2011 9:49:55 GMT
Some weird ideas when I'm reading stuff about morality
Assume morality can be treated as physical matter
Positive-negative assimilation, destruction method
For a negative source (e.g. sexual abuse) Is it approporate and moral to discriminate/ (insert suitable negative action) them? (i.e. -ve-ve anihilation) After that, use positive actions to mediate and eventually remove the negative source
Question 2: Is being immune to negative/evil has the same effect as destroying them in the first place?
|
|
|
Post by ~Memzak~ on Jan 3, 2011 11:39:44 GMT
As to question two...
Not really... because other people could be affected by that same evil, so it's not gone...
Although I am highly confused about this thread...
|
|
|
Post by speedyclock on Jan 8, 2011 21:26:27 GMT
Wait what? I just can't use it as... matter.
Not really matter. But electrical signals in one's mind.
>.>'
|
|