|
Post by RubiksMaster123 on Mar 22, 2011 1:27:24 GMT
60 is definitely a prime.
|
|
|
Post by Elmach on Mar 22, 2011 1:35:11 GMT
But what about 61...
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 22, 2011 2:46:21 GMT
[sarcasm]ERROR ERROR YOU ARE BOTH DISQUALIFIED[/sarcasm]
Meh.
The first non-prime multiple of thirty-one.
|
|
|
Post by Elmach on Mar 22, 2011 2:58:24 GMT
Three Three Sevens.
Not prime.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 22, 2011 3:00:22 GMT
This is going to be fun...
Two Two Two Two Two Twos.
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Mar 23, 2011 16:46:44 GMT
My reply number, a multiple of thirteen...
|
|
|
Post by RubiksMaster123 on Mar 23, 2011 20:53:25 GMT
66. Divisible by 3 primates.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 23, 2011 22:49:51 GMT
[glow=red,2,300]SIXTY-SEVEN
PRIMENESS PWNS[/glow]
|
|
|
Post by RubiksMaster123 on Mar 24, 2011 1:06:11 GMT
68.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 24, 2011 1:08:00 GMT
69
I do not want to make anything dirty out of this.
|
|
|
Post by RubiksMaster123 on Mar 24, 2011 1:27:36 GMT
70
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 24, 2011 2:34:57 GMT
Seventy-vun.
Primeses.
|
|
|
Post by RubiksMaster123 on Mar 24, 2011 10:30:28 GMT
72
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 24, 2011 23:44:03 GMT
SEVENTY-THREE PRIME......
|
|
|
Post by RubiksMaster123 on Mar 25, 2011 0:37:58 GMT
74
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 25, 2011 0:58:41 GMT
Three times five times five.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 25, 2011 3:28:10 GMT
76? A prime? No way!
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Mar 25, 2011 14:54:52 GMT
The fourth possible product of two consecutive primes, where 2 * 3 is the first, 3 * 5 is the second, 5 * 7 is the third, and so on...
|
|
|
Post by RubiksMaster123 on Mar 25, 2011 20:30:37 GMT
78 + 1 = 79 - 1 = 78
|
|
|
Post by Elmach on Mar 26, 2011 2:22:33 GMT
Waitwut? 79. Prime. Duh. Everyone knows that the only factors of 79 are 1 and 79. I'm not being sarcastic here. 79 IS PRIME. You should know that.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 26, 2011 14:00:49 GMT
Yes, but is 80?
...no. Obviously not.
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Mar 26, 2011 14:08:58 GMT
The fourth power of the second prime...
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 26, 2011 14:16:41 GMT
82 isn't either. I get all the evens.
Also, wouldn't three be the third prime, 1 and 2 also being primes?
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Mar 26, 2011 14:18:38 GMT
No, 1 is neither prime nor composite...
...and 83 is prime...
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 26, 2011 14:29:18 GMT
84 sure isn't. Darned evens.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymousperson5 on Mar 26, 2011 16:37:09 GMT
Neither is eighty-five.
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Mar 26, 2011 16:40:51 GMT
Eighty six is out of the question...
|
|
|
Post by RubiksMaster123 on Mar 27, 2011 0:05:33 GMT
87 looks like it has a chance, but too bad.
|
|
|
Post by Elmach on Mar 27, 2011 6:59:09 GMT
88? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? YOU SAY THAT 88 IS PRIME? 88 IS DEFINITELY NOT PRIME. IT HAS TWO, THREE TIMES, AS WELL AS AN ELEVEN. THAT IS VERY MUCH COMPOSITE.
In summary...
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 27, 2011 7:58:01 GMT
89! Must like 2 before it, tis prime.
|
|