|
|
Post by D_M-01 on Dec 2, 2011 22:58:06 GMT
I think a couple of the administrators on this forum tend to have too much butthurt sensitivity, especially over the chat and regards to forum memes and pictures. They are unable to handle a joke and/or are willing to take abusive action when dealing with it. I think that they should understand we are all friends here, and we all have our own sense of humor, some more than others. If something is not to your taste, then you should inform that person of your opinion, not bluntly restrict them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Dec 3, 2011 1:30:21 GMT
I'm sorry, but I've seen your "jokes". They are not a regular person's definition of "jokes". Every single time I see you on chat you are intentionally aggravating someone or other. If it was just me I'd assume it was me being too sensitive, but when you do it to everyone it's pretty obvious what you're actually doing.
|
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on Dec 3, 2011 2:27:11 GMT
I'm sorry, but I've seen your "jokes". They are not a regular person's definition of "jokes". Every single time I see you on chat you are intentionally aggravating someone or other. If it was just me I'd assume it was me being too sensitive, but when you do it to everyone it's pretty obvious what you're actually doing. Cool vidya, yet I would like to see some evidence for your argument. |
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Dec 3, 2011 4:41:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on Dec 3, 2011 22:29:13 GMT
And yet you only banned me for the offense. Sounds more like a biased form of aggression for an administrator to take. It was intended to show your overreaction towards the "offense" as a form of amusement, which you apparently took too seriously. If you felt so strongly about the picture, then you could have just deleted it and informed me not to post it again. Not like I intended to post it again until you decided to ban me for it. |
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Dec 4, 2011 0:57:41 GMT
And yet you only banned me for the offense. Sounds more like a biased form of aggression for an administrator to take. Actually, you weren't the only one banned for it. I also banned one of the anons who also did so. Now, what you should have said is that I did not ban everyone who also did it, in which case you would have been correct. It was intended to show your overreaction towards the "offense" as a form of amusement, which you apparently took too seriously. If you felt so strongly about the picture, then you could have just deleted it and informed me not to post it again. Not like I intended to post it again until you decided to ban me for it. Wait, if it was intended to show my overreaction toward the offense, then it had a serious intention, so if it had a serious intention, it was supposed to be taken seriously. Unless it's possible to take too seriously something that is supposed to be taken seriously and that indeed I did take too seriously something that is supposed to be taken seriously, I hold that I reacted the way I was intended to react. Also, if my banning you has changed whether you would have intended to post it again, then the motivation becomes clear that you want to act out against me by flaming me further, making further postings of that image clear intents to flame and ergo punishable... |
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on Dec 4, 2011 1:07:48 GMT
And yet you only banned me for the offense. Sounds more like a biased form of aggression for an administrator to take. Actually, you weren't the only one banned for it. I also banned one of the anons who also did so. Now, what you should have said is that I did not ban everyone who also did it, in which case you would have been correct. It was intended to show your overreaction towards the "offense" as a form of amusement, which you apparently took too seriously. If you felt so strongly about the picture, then you could have just deleted it and informed me not to post it again. Not like I intended to post it again until you decided to ban me for it. I accidentally Temporarily9 and tl;dr I'm not going to get into a debate with you over a picture of a stick figure. I think Temporarily9's bias is beginning to influence you and if you listen to it, then fine. I don't care. But your aggressive action towards a stick figure is ridiculous and yet an example of how overly serious/sensitive/tyrannical or however you want to call it that you are that you choose to show towards your users. |
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Dec 4, 2011 10:43:57 GMT
So anyone that disagrees with your concept of a joke is biased now? You insist on bringing me into things that don't even involve me, blaming them on me? Argue with Veers all you want, but do NOT bring me into this. There is a large difference between bias and banning trolls, and if you can't be bothered to read the forum rules then maybe you'd be better off somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
Post by nmagain on Dec 4, 2011 12:04:39 GMT
goddamn it guys. it was just a story get over it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Dec 5, 2011 0:47:48 GMT
I don't know nor do I care what started it, but I do care that he brought me into it. Apparently everything he incorrectly sees wrong in Veers is directly my fault.
|
|
|
|
Post by GloveParty on Dec 8, 2011 1:46:09 GMT
*siiiigh*
Always this kind of crap has to go on.
I thought KuraiOorora was respectable...
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Dec 10, 2011 0:52:37 GMT
For a long time he was certainly very respectable. Then he got bored and instead of leaving turned to trolling.
|
|
[M:977802]
