|
Post by D_M-01 on May 20, 2012 21:23:13 GMT
It appeared I was banned on the chat two days ago for informing someone they should change their name to "bloddy cont" because it would be amusing. Clearly, this staff member failed to get the reference to Priok and ended up making a poor decision to ban my profile.
Not only that, but they also had the nerve to call me a "cockmongler" after the ban was made. I find this behavior to be not only hypocritical, but also highly biased and an expression of poor staff behavior. Please administer justice for this appalling behavior as soon as possible. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by Clockwork on May 20, 2012 21:25:31 GMT
I thought you called him stuff before you said "bloddy cont". So that was, quoting veers, "The icing on the cake" or something like that...
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on May 20, 2012 21:35:14 GMT
Well, you were insulting and trolling this staff member many times before he finally gave you a last warning and we all decided to poke fun at anything I would accept as an interest, then when that discussion ended, you suggested that the staff member change his name to "bloody cont." Not only did he presumably fail to get the reference to the Priokism, I too failed to realize it was a Priokism and, having remembered the staff member's provision of the final warning, took that to mean it was time to ban. Even if it was a Priokism, it still seemed very insulting.
In spite of all that, you are right in suggesting that being called a "cockmongler" is rather hypocritical in this case and not very becoming of a staff member. I shall see to it that this user refrain from further insulting anyone, regardless of whether he is insulted...
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on May 20, 2012 21:35:17 GMT
I would like to see screenshots of the previous insults I supposedly made.
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on May 20, 2012 21:38:01 GMT
Sure, and can you provide a screenshot of being called a "cockmongler"? As a matter of fact, depending on how long the discussion concerning "tripwires" went on, the insults you requested should not be so far away from your own claim...
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on May 20, 2012 21:41:35 GMT
I do not need to provide screenshots since I was the one banned. You need them to justify the ban.
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on May 20, 2012 21:43:52 GMT
Strictly speaking, we need to know that you aren't just making it up (or being mistaken about it), just as you need to know that I'm not making up (or am being mistaken about) your having insulted this staff member. In other words, you do need to provide screenshots...
|
|
|
Post by Clockwork on May 20, 2012 22:34:40 GMT
Last I checked, staff members are required to have a screenshot of the incident when filling out a report. If not, it's an invalid report and should be nullified.
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on May 20, 2012 23:29:59 GMT
You're right. Let me nullify the ban right now and - oh wait, he's already unbanned...
|
|
|
Post by Clockwork on May 20, 2012 23:38:32 GMT
That was a general statement, and not in any way directed towards the ban Kurai has experienced. This being said, I don't know why one would beat around the bush when it comes to posting proof of a ban when you have access to it.
|
|