3 Priests 1 Boxer

[HueHuey]

With Mach/Sonic weapons, would that be a good team for PvE?

[IvanYiu247]

It's a pretty strong team, but I think 2P+2B will do better than 3P+1B.

[Alonso]

No, you should have 3priests, one gunner. But yeah, it should be suffecint, just be careful for health.

[Qwerty]

I had a team like this once, I was going for DPS though. For PvE I'd say it really depends on which stage we're talking about here. I think Zelkova made a chart somewhere of efficiency (in DPS) of boxers as proportional to priests.

[Alonso]

I also tried a boxer and 3 priest once, but I used ice weapon on 2 priest and made sure their dex was fast, used a priest with thunder and guide card and they were all Att. Meanwhile my boxer used sonic or just ice.

[zelkova]

Jul 11, 2012 4:47:17 GMT Qwerty said:

I had a team like this once, I was going for DPS though. For PvE I'd say it really depends on which stage we're talking about here. I think Zelkova made a chart somewhere of efficiency (in DPS) of boxers as proportional to priests.

That was someone else. It was with gunners also.

danballforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=sr&action=display&thread=4260

I was inspired to do some lazy minor math and found out that generally you only want to cap yourself at two priests but most of the time to get the bang for your buck you should only need one. Of course with that being said the above chart state otherwise. Then again I was using a normal magician and not a pure attack gunner.

[clockwork]

Jul 10, 2012 15:41:30 GMT Alonso said:

No, you should have 3priests, one gunner. But yeah, it should be suffecint, just be careful for health.

haha this... 3 priests and one gunner is beast

[Alonso]

But it has a weakness to poison, everyone knows that

[Qwerty]

Just be careful when fighting poison enemies, or maybe stick a poison charm on.