|
|
Post by mdog95 on Aug 29, 2011 2:30:07 GMT
I think he was referring to mine. I just consider a criminal anybody who has done some kind of criminal act to the point where it hurt somebody. I don't count things like double posting, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Likep on Sept 4, 2011 19:54:09 GMT
One more thing; Is it illegal to transfer badges from one account to another?
The account 'Likep15' was destroyed while my computer was getting fixed the other day.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Sept 4, 2011 20:01:40 GMT
How could it have been destroyed? The account itself isn't stored locally on your computer: you just have to remember a username and password, and then ProBoards should let you access your account.
Be it as it may, no: you can transfer badges and Dan-Balls and karma and post count from one account to another in the event that something happens to your account...
|
|
|
|
Post by nmagain on Sept 15, 2011 20:53:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by izacque on Sept 16, 2011 2:00:49 GMT
Vote Sparkpowder for Administrator
|
|
|
|
Post by nmagain on Sept 16, 2011 10:17:12 GMT
Sparkpowder for Administrator 2018
|
|
|
|
Post by kingpin0422 on Sept 17, 2011 1:32:59 GMT
Shouldn't it be against the rules to false report?
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Sept 17, 2011 7:50:37 GMT
It hasn't really been a problem. If it becomes one, sure, but we trust our users not to do that, plus one person's false report is another's serious issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jackamole on Dec 11, 2011 9:17:59 GMT
Sensible rules. Great! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Jackamole on Dec 11, 2011 9:21:44 GMT
Hello. I trust most of you are uploaders. I am Jackamole.  |
|
|
|
Post by izacque on Dec 11, 2011 11:28:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by nmagain on Dec 11, 2011 17:03:09 GMT
>Just read rules
|
|
|
|
Post by nmagain on Dec 11, 2011 17:03:30 GMT
>Double posts
|
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Dec 11, 2011 18:13:14 GMT
Welcome to the forum, Jackamole. I am quite curious, though, after seeing Nmagane's point in the form of ironic mockery - why did you double post after reading rules that told you explicitly not to double post?
Looking elsewhere, it seems you might not know how to edit your posts. Instead of double posting, you can edit your posts as a registered member by going to the top right corner of your post, clicking the "edit" button, and then modifying the post as desired...
|
|
|
|
Post by nmagain on Apr 23, 2012 7:38:19 GMT
why is flagbanning against the rules? everybody can easily unflag themselves. (unless they're dumb)
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Apr 23, 2012 22:59:44 GMT
Not everyone can, especially new members. Knowing how to bypass banning systems shouldn't be a requirement on any chat. Besides, it's intended as a trolling mechanism.
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Memzak~ on Apr 24, 2012 11:49:26 GMT
Agreed. Flag banning can be pesky an annoying for the experienced user, but for a new user it's a nightmare.
|
|
|
|
Post by Negateck on Jun 8, 2012 3:12:22 GMT
Technically we are a PG-13 forum, although we unofficially accept people younger. However, if schools teach people about sexual harassment in fifth grade, I'm pretty sure we can allow it here. They do. also, about the other websites thing, what if it is related to the topic? |
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 8, 2012 3:29:36 GMT
Yeah, other websites can be linked or whatever. That rule mostly exists to prevent advertising.
|
|
|
|
Post by izacque on Jun 8, 2012 22:47:06 GMT
I take issue with rule 7 in the respect section (Use of Social Groups as an Insult or derogatory term). I believe that rules should reflect what we, the community want (The exception is rules we have that comply with ProBoards TOS). I do not believe that the community wants this rule in its present form. I would like to see this rule discussed and modified by the community.
|
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on Jun 8, 2012 23:20:42 GMT
I take issue with rule 7 in the respect section (Use of Social Groups as an Insult or derogatory term). I believe that rules should reflect what we, the community want (The exception is rules we have that comply with ProBoards TOS). I do not believe that the community wants this rule in its present form. I would like to see this rule discussed and modified by the community. Every other day there's an argument over shit like Canada vs. America. The rule should either be modified or enforced better. |
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 9, 2012 0:59:10 GMT
I don't take issue, and nor (I believe) does Veers. Fox is a maybe. You may not be offended by it, but there ARE people that are highly offended by such language. You have no idea of knowing just how offended they can be. The forum is for everyone, not just a majority of, frankly, straight WASPs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Negateck on Jun 9, 2012 1:06:58 GMT
is this forum about  |
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 9, 2012 1:08:01 GMT
No, but we do have a board about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by nmagain on Jun 9, 2012 11:06:24 GMT
I don't take issue, and nor (I believe) does Veers. Fox is a maybe. You may not be offended by it, but there ARE people that are highly offended by such language. You have no idea of knowing just how offended they can be. The forum is for everyone, not just a majority of, frankly, straight WASPs. >on the internet >getting offended grow up, please. |
|
|
|
Post by Fringe Pioneer on Jun 9, 2012 14:02:57 GMT
Connected with other human beings and being offensive to them? Grow up and learn some sensibilities, please. There are so many other ways to be profane instead of saying something is "gay" or "white" or "retarded" or what have you. Use them instead of the words that represent real groups of people...
|
|
|
|
Post by izacque on Jun 10, 2012 1:54:15 GMT
regardless of whether or not people can get offended, does the community want rules with no purpose than to keep people from getting offended? Furthermore, I find it impossible to follow rule 7 to the letter on the DBF chat. it would result in ridiculous amounts of banning that, instead of correcting the issue, would cause some of the most active members to be so resentful, that they would do what they could to make chat even worse. I am not necessarily proposing we remove rule 7, but we need to have a version of it that we can actually enforce.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 10, 2012 1:56:39 GMT
Don't use derogatory terms in an insulting fashion. Is it seriously that hard to do? If a member finds that very simple rule impossible to follow, frankly they should find another forum that doesn't care. I think 4chan would be perfectly accepting.
|
|
|
|
Post by izacque on Jun 10, 2012 1:59:09 GMT
Then what's acceptable? Is Sparkpowder* a Faggot? Is he Gay? Is he Retarded? Is he Stupid? Is he Annoying? Is he Dislikable? Is he Imperfect? Those are all derogatory terms.
*it's just an example!
|
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on Jun 10, 2012 1:59:50 GMT
Don't use derogatory terms in an insulting fashion. Is it seriously that hard to do? If a member finds that very simple rule impossible to follow, frankly they should find another forum that doesn't care. I think 4chan would be perfectly accepting. So you're labeling a good sized amount of users on the forum fit for 4chan, is that what you're getting at. |
|
[M:977802]
